Migrate to Alpine, use Alpine's ImageMagick packages, add ImageMagick security policy, update Ruby version and a few gems

requested review from @anusha

assigned to @ernstprr

test are failing with selenium:

Community upgrading to selenium 4:
Need to switch parameters (see https://github.com/samvera/hyrax/pull/5872/files )

added 38 commits

• c0156aac...659ed3f4 - 33 commits from branch develop
• d3d63116 - Fix hyrax/docker-entrypoint.sh, migrate from /bin/bash to /bin/sh
• bbb77ecb - Update FITS from version 1.5.0 to 1.5.5
• ae3f10ad - hyrax/Dockerfile: Migrate from Debian to Alpine, use distro imagemagick
• 1540f54b - Update from Ruby 2.7.5 to 2.7.6 and update various gems
• 83a17fe8 - Update hyrax/package.json: Update and fix universal viewer

Compare with previous version

added 7 commits

• 83a17fe8...3860975b - 2 commits from branch develop
• b6db5531 - Fix hyrax/docker-entrypoint.sh, migrate from /bin/bash to /bin/sh
• efe634fe - Update FITS from version 1.5.0 to 1.5.5
• bddaf30f - hyrax/Dockerfile: Migrate from Debian to Alpine, use distro imagemagick
• d641e68d - Update from Ruby 2.7.5 to 2.7.6 and update various gems
• 10eb45ed - Update hyrax/package.json: Update and fix universal viewer

Compare with previous version

added 12 commits

• 10eb45ed...4cdcaf8a - 7 commits from branch develop
• 4255f3e1 - Fix hyrax/docker-entrypoint.sh, migrate from /bin/bash to /bin/sh
• 0a0e1231 - Update FITS from version 1.5.0 to 1.5.5
• f3564d3f - hyrax/Dockerfile: Migrate from Debian to Alpine, use distro imagemagick
• 81824a8e - Update from Ruby 2.7.5 to 2.7.6 and update various gems
• a0d65aec - Update hyrax/package.json: Update and fix universal viewer

Compare with previous version

added Waiting to be tested label

@anusha from the RUB RDMS project side I agree to the strategy keeping code close to the Hyrax base, as Hyrax is using alpine (see github). Another the RDMS project requirement is that gems are being up to date at newest versions providing latest security patches.

I wonder if the label "needs approval" would need further approval from the project management by @paulwalk ? Or do we have an issue in the https://gitlab.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/FDM/rdm-system/antleaf-projectmanagement/ repository ?

mentioned in merge request !89 (merged)

The changes in this have been incorporated in https://gitlab.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/FDM/rdm-system/rdms/-/merge_requests/89. This MR can be closed.

@frenzjb5 Needs approval was an internal label we were using, poorly worded. It's a reminder that the merge request needed to be reviewed and tested.

removed Waiting to be tested label

closed